Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:14:47 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
>exim is good, but it does not have a secure design, and it is nowhere
>near as fast (especially under heavy load - which is when speed counts)
I feel compelled, again, to point out that this is not known. Show
numbers, Craig. Sound familiar (Linux faster than FreeBSD, anyone?)
>exim suffers from the same kind of scaling problems as sendmail and smail do.
From what I understand both of those called external programs for
delivery which is the cause of the scaling problems. Exim does not do that,
it does the delivery. Where are the numbers?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN3q3jHpf7K2LbpnFEQIEDACfQfQYJAETMUFTQVdykll11SWkZk8Anilc
yo3o1ZaxWBp2mEfmd2lQ9BM6
=89+d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: