Re: ITP: gettext-base
> > I still think that this package should be split upstream and the gettext
> > utility included with other libc support utilities. What do you think?
> Essentially, if you collaborate with the upstream authors on this
> matter, it would be excellent.
Uh? I would be more than willing to do it... it's trivial from the
technical point of view... It's more of a political/organizative thing, I
think. Separating the catalogs would just imply running msgmerge on the old
messages and the new (2) .pot files...
Reply to: