Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:18:08 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>You are kidding, right? If not I suggest you get some good books on
>secure programming and take some time to read them.
No, I'm not kidding. I followed several threads about postfix security
on Bugtraq and did not see any concerns there *or* anything from the
pro-postfix people that would suggest to me that postfix is any more secure
than any other MTA. What I did read was that it was a trade-off of a group
readable directory versus a SUID binary. Needless to say that appears to me
1/2 of one, 6 of the other.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN3f0W3pf7K2LbpnFEQKKOACeN0B0B6rbFW1SRIdN62OoOxNalxcAoJb6
Iz0lUfntZ/KwZKPnzG3yCDq0
=Oiuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: