Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups
- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: LSB specification for adding users and groups
- From: Alan Cox <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:21:19 +0100 (BST)
- Message-id: <E10uMBU-0000NMfirstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <199906161919.PAA03883@chef.redhat.com> from "email@example.com" at Jun 16, 99 03:19:27 pm
> What about binaries that have uid/gid info hard coded? qmail used to
> do this, at least (and may still, I have no idea). Even if it doesn't,
> do we need to state that LSB compliant apps *can't* hard code uids?
I think we do. We can permit them to code actual name strings, although the
have to fail gracefully if someone does remove their name.