On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 06:32:42PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 10:09:37PM -0700, David Starner wrote: > > One, that developers take "all the software that you might > > reasonably want to install if you didn't know what it was > > or don't have specialised requirements" more strictly. > > With 2792 optional packages to 573 extra (in my available files), the > distinction is nearly worthless. Perhaps this might be because the default rules made by dh_make sets the priority at optional? I'm definitely guilty, myself, at leaving the priority at what dh_make had put in the control file, when I used it to create my packages... perhaps setting it initially to "extra" would be better? At least for those new packages that use dh_make... JM2C, of couse ;) Stevie -- Webster's Dictionary definition of Windows95: Windows95: <win-doz-nin-te-fiv> n. 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Description: PGP signature