Brock Rozen wrote: > I didn't see support for pico in this -- thus, I'm against this proposal > until sensible-editor has pico support. (If I'm mistaken,and it does have > pico support, then I will second this proposal). Um, unless I'm mistaken it's a matter of pico having sensible-editor support, not the other way around. > BTW, this isn't in the BTS (At least, I see no reference number above). I track everything, in the bts or not. -- see shy jo