Lalo Martins <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Otherwise it should probably be removed from the archive, since it's
> not stable enought to be useful by itself as is IMHO (last version
> is a Beta).
I don't see where the problem is (no I didn't read the mentioned bug
report), this program works quite good for me. So I don't like to hear
that it should be removed. Sorry, I don't have the time nor the Perl
knowledge to take this over myself.
> And one thing the upstream maintainer should probably think about
> (or the new upstream maintainer) is some DSC conformance; html2ps
> output can't be filtered trough psnup, psselect, pstops, mpage or
> anything like this.
And you may want to read the manual:
Generate DSC compliant PostScript. This requires
Ghostscript and can take quite some time to do.
Note that a PostScript file generated with this
option cannot be used as input to html2ps for
But don't ask me, why this isn't activated by default...
* email@example.com * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
PGP: 1024/DD08DD6D 2D E7 CC DE D5 8D 78 BE 3C A0 A4 F1 4B 09 CE AF
- From: Lalo Martins <firstname.lastname@example.org>