Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo

To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 13:57:52 +0100
Message-id: <19990604135752.B504@portaloo.>
Mail-followup-to: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990604032757.G7209@debian.org>; from Joseph Carter on Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 03:27:57AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 19990604044909.A12571@ecn.purdue.edu> <[🔎] 19990604032757.G7209@debian.org>

On debian-devel, Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> wrote:
> > I don't know how controversial this suggestion will be, but I propose that
> > the official version of the new logo be the one with the bottle in it.
> 
> If we have to have the bottle, I'd agree with you---we should.

AOL

I think that a swirl on its own would work better for a logo in an icon, maybe
for .deb files in a file manager. 

-- 
I consume, therefore I am

Attachment: pgp3BoLLpzCSR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
- Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: PRCS users
Next by Date: Re: ITP: netcomics
Previous by thread: Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
Next by thread: Re: [PROPOSED] Swap the "open" and "official" versions of the new logo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread