RE: splitting sysklogd
On 28-May-99 Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> I would like to propose splitting sysklogd into two parts: syslogd and
> klogd. I am the author of an alternative syslogd called syslog-ng, and I
> would need klogd's functionalities (e.g. reading kernel log, and
> substituting kernel symbols), but will have to conflict the current
> syslogd, since two logging daemons cannot run at the same time.
> Would this be possible?
I hope some way of resolving this can be found. A few people have mentioned
desire to play with a package of this, myself included.