Re: better /etc/init.d/network

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: better /etc/init.d/network
From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 13:24:16 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990520132415.D210@wonderland.linux.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87d7zvojev.fsf@piracy.red-bean.com>; from Craig Brozefsky on Thu, May 20, 1999 at 08:22:32AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 871zgdou2e.fsf@piracy.red-bean.com> <[🔎] 19990519143615.A990@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 87d7zvojev.fsf@piracy.red-bean.com>

On May 20, Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com> wrote:
 >> With this scheme scripts can't be easily disabled.
 >mv /etc/network/eth0.postup.leafnode /etc/network/off.eth0.postup.leafnode
dpkg would not be happy.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

References:
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network
  - From: Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com>
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network
  - From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: better /etc/init.d/network
  - From: Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com>

Prev by Date: Re: gdm/xdm/login.app weirdnesses
Next by Date: Re: Intent to maintainer change: canna
Previous by thread: Re: better /etc/init.d/network
Next by thread: Re: better /etc/init.d/network
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread