On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:13:10PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > > mozilla should work for potato
> > > Maybe it will ;) We'll try.
> > If it doesn't, I guess the current mozilla should be removed? It's sort
> > of old now, and it doesn't work with glibc 2.1.
> I was kidding - newer mozilla *does* work, just not the versions people
> expect from us. We had it working just fine in versions 19990323 and 19990402
> (ask Brent Fulgham, maybe there were more),
Would it be possible to at least have one of those in potato? I was
using Mozilla 19981008 for a while with some happiness, but eventually
got annoyed by some of its bugs and that it wasn't getting updated. :-/
It'd be nice to have a free, frames & java & such -capable browser to
install, without having to wrestle with the big green dragon...
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.
``There's nothing worse than people with a clue.
They're always disagreeing with you.''
-- Andrew Over
Attachment:
pgpKbayMKDXtZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature