On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:53:11PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:13:10PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > > mozilla should work for potato > > > Maybe it will ;) We'll try. > > If it doesn't, I guess the current mozilla should be removed? It's sort > > of old now, and it doesn't work with glibc 2.1. > I was kidding - newer mozilla *does* work, just not the versions people > expect from us. We had it working just fine in versions 19990323 and 19990402 > (ask Brent Fulgham, maybe there were more), Would it be possible to at least have one of those in potato? I was using Mozilla 19981008 for a while with some happiness, but eventually got annoyed by some of its bugs and that it wasn't getting updated. :-/ It'd be nice to have a free, frames & java & such -capable browser to install, without having to wrestle with the big green dragon... Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``There's nothing worse than people with a clue. They're always disagreeing with you.'' -- Andrew Over
Attachment:
pgpKbayMKDXtZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature