[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Removing bash (Was: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?)



On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 07:32:44PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> Yes, I like the solution with sash, but it requires some tweaking as
> compared to the current Debian setup. One has to either
> 
> 1) specify the shell to invoke at the LILO prompt and I bet that most users
>    and majority of admins doesn't care to take a look at the LILO doc or
>    sulogin(8) manpage
> 2) changing the boot scripts to set SUSHELL to shash
> 3) change sulogin to use the toor account in the single mode

So you're currently trying to account for the situation where someone
can figure out how to recover from a terminally inconsistent
installation (from user error, dpkg error, etc.) but can't figure out
how to type "linux init=/bin/sash", add a new user, or boot from rescue
media? I just don't think this is a large enough segment of the user
base (1? 2?) to justify the changes, even if they are simple. Adding a
new root user opens a whole new security issue (does everyone know to
take special precautions for the toor account like changing the password
frequently, making sure toor can't ftp in, etc.?) And no static package
can possibly provide the level of protection you'd get from booting off
floppy or cd, so you ought to have one or the other around anyway...

Mike Stone

Attachment: pgpXYzAZylupX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: