Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?

To: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Cc: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14104.51375.733500.1453@sonny.econ.queensu.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990418014834.A9657@rising.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 19990417160850.A7834@rising.com.au> <[🔎] E10YNYI-0005rI-00@teleute.rpglink.com> <[🔎] 19990418014834.A9657@rising.com.au>

  Hamish>  Big deal. Honestly, I don't see that the saving is even worth a
  Hamish> discussion.  RAM is cheap, swap space even cheaper.

Quite. 

If someone wants to locally optimize their system [1], fine. The operative
term here is 'local'.  We have better 'big picture' things to work on [2].

[1] I know what it's like, having a laptop with a mere 16mb of ram.
[2] Please see Raphael bug score pages.

-- 
Sorry for replying late to your mail, but I have been been away for a few days.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
  - From: "Steve Lamb" <morpheus@rpglink.com>

References:
- Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
  - From: "Steve Lamb" <morpheus@rpglink.com>
- Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: AHA 2940U2W Support under Debian
Next by Date: Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
Previous by thread: Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
Next by thread: Re: /etc/init.d/network is too simple?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread