On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 04:23:26AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 10:13:47AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > ctwm > > vtwm > > Hm. Since I maintain the thing these are based on, it might not be a bad > idea for me adopt these. How actively maintained upstream are these? Do > they track changes in XFree86's twm (not that I think there have been any > since the Pleistocene epoch)? > > If no one else has a burning interest in these, I'll take them. I may want ctwm... I'm trying to configure the damned thing at the moment. If I'm successful in getting it to work and Not Suck, I want it. => > In my own attack, however, I must say that my only non-xfree86 package, > xtrs (contrib), is effectively orphaned. I've been meaning to get back to > it, but I am now several versions behind on it. I'm not sure these twm hacks are actively maintained upstream these days.. (Is twm even actively maintained these days?) -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * boren tosses matlab across the room and hopes it breaks into a number aproaching infinite peices
Attachment:
pgpeXrmCjK4DC.pgp
Description: PGP signature