Reply-to: to point back to list? (was Re: We can halve volume by not allowing nondevelopers to post)
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 01:28:22AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:50:43 +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
[snippety]
> >setting Reply-To: back to the list is brain-dead.
>
> I have yet to see a single valid arguement to that assertation.
While trying to dodge the mud slung, I'd like to give a pointer to
http://garcon.unicom.com/FAQ/reply-to-harmful.html . Though I am by now
means any expert on these issues, it convinced me not to point reply-to
back to the list.
Best regards,
Fredrik Juhlin laz@rjdk.com http://www.rjdk.com/
Cellular: +46 (0)709 52 40 72 Office: +46 (0)31 755 25 10
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Reply to: