Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Roman Hodek wrote:
> Just to say it again: Lack of different -dev packages for glibc2.0 and
> glibc2.1 will be a serious trouble for the build daemon machines
> (doing recompilations for non-i386 archs).
Why? Several non-i386 archs already use glibc2.1. The rest should make
the change at the same time as i386.
David Starner - OSU student - firstname.lastname@example.org
If you want a real optimist, look up Ray Bradbury. Guy's nuts.
He actually likes people. -David Brin