Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?

To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 18:29:59 -0800
Message-id: <v04104400b300fcf49650@[206.163.71.146]>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990301201751.2331F-100000@eiterra.ketyra.int>
References: <[🔎] 19990302004523.A12030@hairnet.demon.co.uk>

At 20:51 -0500 1999-03-01, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:

Libraries
  glibc 2.1           - lots of recompiles


I won't support glibc 2.1 fully till licensing issues are resolved. And
GNU won't release it till those issues are resolved. So that's up in the
air for now at least.

FUCK! HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES MUST I FUCKING REPEAT THIS, THERE ARE NOFUCKING LICENSING ISSUES! FUCK! FUCK! FUCK!

--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)                     <URL:http://web.espy.org/>
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org>                  <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- <URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: "James A. Treacy" <treacy@debian.org>
- Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: "Phillip R. Jaenke" <prj@nls.net>
- Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: "Alexander N. Benner" <Nikodemus@innocent.com>

References:
- slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>
- Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: "Phillip R. Jaenke" <prj@nls.net>

Prev by Date: Re: glibc 2.1 notes
Next by Date: Congratulations, everyone!!
Previous by thread: Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Next by thread: Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread