Re: Debian/GNU NetBSD
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Anonymous wrote:
8< SNIP! >8
> Debian would be STUPID to try to use NetBSD code in any of its projects.
At the risk of getting back into this godforsaken argument, which I really
don't need right now, (I'm going to be sending out a notice as to why in a
moment.) I've got to ask.
How in the HELL did it suddenly become Debian GNU/NetBSD? Last I checked,
we were talking Debian GNU/FreeBSD or Debian GNU/OpenBSD. Never once have
I advocated NetBSD, because I know that that it *will* degrade into a
fiasco much like the one with Theo.
I will not, and cannot advocate *any* project involving NetBSD for this
very reason. When people ask me what OS should they use for their
webserver, it's either Linux, FreeBSD, or OpenBSD. NetBSD's core is
disorganized, argumentative, and as has been proven, openly hostile and
hateful at times. If you have problems upstream, they spread downstream,
and all hell breaks loose within a short while.
+-------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Phillip R. Jaenke | "Not all wisdom comes from without; |
| prj@nls.net -and- | much wisdom can only come from |
| rs6000@linuxguru.net | within. Only you can teach yourself |
| Professional Unix Guru | some of the most important lessons |
+-------------------------+ of life." --Takes-Many-Roads, |
Project Head | Silent Strider Theurge |
the Linux-RS/6000 Project +--------------------------------------+
- - http://www.nls.net/mp/prj/linux/ -- http://www.nls.net/mp/prj/ -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNtW57sES8LwwGtVlAQFS6gQAvL546rx1I5ilP+F0NgzuSmjznoTlRdDY
s15xyvYxSUFCO6+gG2nLEXvnAiDf/POSUpx0PEEXpOXnM+Rhaz8Lwu5+CkZC3XQK
8hhxgB5Wbwtd7XxYSgNHp+szWGIS/Yy7TAQTJCM4Z3P93zVZGgMXhgvDkc4oPyTR
tx/95pi6cpg=
=qWrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: