Re: FVWM 2.2 officially released
> > (1) Have fvwm become an empty package (priority extra) which Depends:
> > fvwm2. OK.
>
> No. This is a vomitous solution; do not be seduced into using it.
OK -- you would probably know best 8-)
> > (3) Use some nice, new Replaced-by: feature or similar. If it
> > exists.
>
> It doesn't exist. Yet. Jason Gunthorpe says it is impossible to implement
> in the fully general form that people want. I trust his judgement, but I'd
> still like to see a while paper on the subject. :)
Shame that...
> Thanks for taking over fvwm; it's nice to see it actively maintained again.
Pleasure! Let's see if I can learn enough X to make a decent job of
it....
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer. jdg@debian.org
-*- Finger jdg@master.debian.org for my PGP public key. -*-
Reply to: