[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FVWM 2.2 officially released

> > (1) Have fvwm become an empty package (priority extra) which Depends:
> >     fvwm2.  OK.
> No.  This is a vomitous solution; do not be seduced into using it.

OK -- you would probably know best 8-)

> > (3) Use some nice, new Replaced-by: feature or similar.  If it
> >     exists.
> It doesn't exist.  Yet.  Jason Gunthorpe says it is impossible to implement
> in the fully general form that people want.  I trust his judgement, but I'd
> still like to see a while paper on the subject.  :)

Shame that...

> Thanks for taking over fvwm; it's nice to see it actively maintained again.

Pleasure!  Let's see if I can learn enough X to make a decent job of



  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
             Debian GNU/Linux Developer.  jdg@debian.org
       -*- Finger jdg@master.debian.org for my PGP public key. -*-

Reply to: