Re: Kernel 2.2 and Slink
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 03:18:30PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> Shouldn't be too bad. It's not very incompatible. Most perl packages
> might have to be re-compiled and uploaded, but the changes will in 99% of
> cases be zero or trivial.
> Add to my list, as people have said, 3.3.3 and maybe glibc2.1, and I think
> this is a realistic set of potato goals..
It seems that glibc2.1 has been temporarily withdrawn... apparently due
to some sort of license problem. :-( Look at
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.1-README for the (very brief)