On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 09:04:14AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > One small nit: that's a logical fallacy. You're arguing from > specifics to generalities which simply isn't possible. Consider the > (in)famous Monthy Python reference: all duck's float, therefore > everything that floats is a duck. :) These things do not cause Santiago to lose any sleep. He's quite adept at begging two different questions, then citing one as support for the other. > If you really think that should be the case, propose a formal > ammendment to policy *explicitly* declarig it to be so. Appealing to > Ian (or anyone else) is mute: we've got a constitution, use it. :) He has done so; but it is also drawing criticism for not being explicit enough. I guess we'll see what happens. -- G. Branden Robinson | Somebody once asked me if I thought sex Debian GNU/Linux | was dirty. I said, "It is if you're branden@ecn.purdue.edu | doing it right." cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Woody Allen
Attachment:
pgpLM_WAafOLd.pgp
Description: PGP signature