[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.



On 7 Feb 1999, James Troup wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> 
> > According to your interpretation, conflicting packages which are
> > both required, or both important, are allowed, right? :-)
> 
> Since an Essential[1] package conflicting with another Essential
> package is the only way to replace an Essential package, I'd say so,
> yes.

I wouldn't say so. The essential flag does not imply required priority.
We can have two conflicting essential packages, but only one of them is
of required priority.

-- 
 "fba142772e1969bede2108f2c17ac636" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: