Re: glibc 2.1 and potato
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 18:41 +0100 1999-02-03, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> >On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Joel Klecker wrote:
> >Uhm, it will be ... lots of libraries.
> >gorgo@lovi:/usr/lib$ grep -l _IO_ *.so | wc -l
> > 54
> >This is more than half of the installed libs...
>
> Actually, I made an error, it's just the _IO_std{in,out,err}_ symbols
> that cause this problem.
Doesn't make much difference:
gorgo@lovi:/usr/lib$ egrep -l '_IO_std(in|out|err)' *.so | wc -l
50
> >So it is only the libstdc++ library that needs a new soname ? The others
> >don't ?
>
> There really isn't an incompatibility on the runtime level, just compile time.
At least we don't have to go thru the whole library set change again
(rpath ? ;)) So why is libstdc++ incompatible ?
--
Madarasz Gergely gorgo@caesar.elte.hu gorgo@linux.rulez.org
It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.
HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/
Reply to: