Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
Joey Hess wrote:
> > I think it's not necessary that a developer agree with the DFSG. It
> > should be enough that they indicate they understand it and will
> > abide by it in what they produce for debian.
Then, Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> wrote:
> Yes, but OTOH, it's a little hard to fathom why someone would *want*
> to work on Debian if they didn't agree with at least the basic
> outlines of the DFSG and the Social Contract....
Of course, you're both right. Therefore, we should require that
developers understand and abide by the DFSG, and let the rest take care
of itself.
Brian
Reply to: