Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)

To: "Debian Developer's List" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
From: Ossama Othman <othman@cs.wustl.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:31:14 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.96.990118212918.25510V-100000@lindy.cs.wustl.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.SOL.3.96.990118211435.25510T-100000@lindy.cs.wustl.edu>

Hi,

I wrote:
> I was referring specifically to Craig.  Rather I was referring to some of

Sorry, that should have been "I was NOT referring specifically to Craig."
Boy am I going to hear it for this foul up! :)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
  - From: Ossama Othman <othman@cs.wustl.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
Next by Date: Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
Previous by thread: Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
Next by thread: Re: agreeing with the DFSG (was Re: non-free --> non-dfsg)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread