[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free --> non-dfsg

Previously David Welton wrote:
> Well, even if RMS doesn't care for it, you can pull out the Open
> Source definition, which is definitive and specific, and generally
> used as the benchmark for what 'free' is.

You do know the OS definition is the same as the current DFSG, right?


This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgpWNANFRY2QV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: