Re: Ldd returning signal 11

To: "Debian Developer's List" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Ldd returning signal 11
From: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 15:33:40 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.4.02.9811201532430.13854-100000@breezy.tn.cornell.edu>
Reply-to: Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199811202122320860.0073CCFC@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

Hi,

> Kernel 2.1.126 did that here, 127 and 128 didn't. Haven't tried 129 yet.

Thanks!  I have 2.1.126 installed so that explains it.  Much appreciated!
:)

-Ossama
______________________________________________________________________
Ossama Othman <othman@astrosun.tn.cornell.edu>
58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44  74 9F 3C D4 EF BF 35 88  1024/8A04D15D 1998/08/26

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Ldd returning signal 11
  - From: "Josip Rodin" <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>

Prev by Date: Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Next by Date: Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Previous by thread: Re: Ldd returning signal 11
Next by thread: Wrong placing of ..bin/dirname
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread