Re: libgtop0 ==> libgtop1?
In article <[🔎] 19981108122055.E615@usa.net>, Michael Meskes
<meskes@usa.net> writes
>On Sat, Nov 07, 1998 at 11:45:11AM +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>> >> Should libgtop0 be renamed libgtop1 and the old version restored
>> >> as libgtop0 (which I don't think I have a copy of, incidentally).
>> >> What about libgtop-daemon and libgtop-dev?
>> >
>> >I'm going to recompile the gnome stuff this week. There are a bunch
>> >of fixes to go in as well.
>
>If that means the packages will depend on libgtop1 that's fine. But the
>libgtop package must not be called libgtop0 anymore.
Jim Pick may want to reupload the last libgtop0 he made for oldlibs,
I don't know if it is worth it or not.
>> Right, so the old version does not need to be reinstated, but should
>> the package be renamed libgtop1 or left as libgtop0?
>
>It has to be renamed.
OK, I've uploaded a renamed one to incoming (although it is completely
screwed up due to my accidental deletion of *.files).
Thanks
Ian
--
Ian Lynagh - ian@lynagh.demon.co.uk
http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/
Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
Reply to: