[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ammendment: Constituion



>>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 1998 17:45:16 -0500, Dan Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> said:

 Dan> On Thu, Oct 29, 1998 at 03:05:24PM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
 >> WHEREAS, In light of the frustration expressed by Manoj and felt
 >> by many others, I feel a flaw in the current proposed constitution
 >> has been exposed.
 >>
 >> THEREFORE, I propose the wording of constitution be changed as
 >> follows:
 >>
 >> in Section A.2. Calling for a vote -1. The proposer of a motion or
 >> an amendment may call for a vote, +1. The proposer or a second of
 >> a motion or an amendment may call for a vote, -2. The proposer of
 >> a motion may call for a vote on any or all the +2. The proposer or
 >> a second of a motion may call for a vote on any or all the -the
 >> proposer of an amendment may call for a vote only on that +the
 >> proposer of or a second of an amendment may call for a vote only
 >> on that
 >>
 >>
 >> This proposal will require either the approval of Guy and all
 >> orginal seconds (of which I am one) or 5 seconds of its own.

 Dan> Seconded, if necessary.

And another if neccessary.

Dres
-- 
@James LewisMoss <dres@ioa.com>         |  Blessed Be!
@    http://www.ioa.com/~dres           |  Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach


Reply to: