Re: [<warp@whitestar.soark.net>] Bug#27841: apt: apt depends on a missing library
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without
> a -dev.
>
> Is anyone going to do this?
>
> Ben
See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we should?" right
now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the time to look at
http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why the compiled
libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is missing a lot of
important symbols". I can't figure it out.
Dan
Reply to: