Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 16:29:19 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980803162919.32240@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980803194455.4741A-100000@cantor.unex.es>; from Santiago Vila on Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 07:50:01PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 19980803124243.47595@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980803194455.4741A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> Recursion is not a stupid thing as long as it does not end up in an
> endless loop.

Depends on the application.  Consider embedded systems (designed to 
run indefinitely).

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Next by Date: Re: SAL and Debian
Previous by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Next by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread