On Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 03:50:10PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > Absolutely. We would need email support. However, I can't imagine that it > would be all that hard to add it to mutt. Bear in mind that it will take > months to get all developers using new keys anyway, I'm only suggesting we > begin this process. Considering it was already there and just taken out till the program matures a bit, yeah.. > > Um, can't PGP 5.0 and gpg sign messages to eachother and the like? AFAIK > > they're supposed to be compatible. > > The web pages suggest that gpg can verify PGP 5 messages. Presumably gpg > can't do anything that actually requires use of the IDEA or RSA algorithms, > though, since it doesn't have any code for them on principle... I believe PGP 5 can use ElGammal or whatever, so we can have some compatibility I hope. We shall soon see.
Attachment:
pgpNWxP3WzSCz.pgp
Description: PGP signature