> I think I will have to change that (I'm the author of radiusd-cistron). > As it is written now it looks like I am saying things in the name of > Livingston which is probably not OK. > > The Livingston part of the license is OK, it's standard BSD style. > I think I should be able to slap GPL on top of that right? I dont know for sure, but I think it would be ok to say that the stuff you did is GPL'ed, and the livingston stuff goes under their license. But this is pretty much what it says now anyway..
Attachment:
pgpxsDwvM8Bu9.pgp
Description: PGP signature