[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems with diald, and local network



On Thu, 02 Jul 1998 14:27:09 +1000 Tim Bell (bhat@cs.mu.OZ.AU) wrote:

> I posted this to debian-user yesterday (with no response so far), and it
> just occurred to me that seeing hamm is still beta, maybe this should go
> here too...
> The second problem is with diald.  I've connected okay using pon (which
> calls pppd), but when using diald, things just stop (at 20:16:57 in the
> log below):
> 
> Jun 30 20:16:56 timtam chat[898]: send (ppp^M)
> Jun 30 20:16:56 timtam chat[898]: send (\d)
> Jun 30 20:16:57 timtam diald[875]: Running pppd (pid = 905).
> Jun 30 20:16:57 timtam diald[905]: Running pppd: /usr/sbin/pppd -detach
> modem crtscts mtu 1500 mru 1500 netmask 255.255.255.192 
> Jun 30 20:17:32 timtam diald[875]: child process 905 terminated with signal 1
> Jun 30 20:17:33 timtam diald[875]: Running connect (pid = 928).
> Jun 30 20:17:34 timtam diald[875]: Delaying 30 seconds before clear to dial.
> 
> whereas with pon/pppd, I get:
> 
> Jun 29 22:00:00 timtam chat[4427]: send (ppp^M)
> Jun 29 22:00:00 timtam chat[4427]: send (\d)
> Jun 29 22:00:01 timtam pppd[4426]: Serial connection established.
> Jun 29 22:00:02 timtam pppd[4426]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 29 22:00:02 timtam pppd[4426]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> Jun 29 22:00:02 timtam pppd[4426]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xffff8c25> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> [etc.]
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Version numbers, kernel and hardware configuration, etc., available on
> request.
> 
> (I'm actually quite embarrassed to be asking this here -- I expected
> that my 7th or so Debian install should be troublefree, or require at
> the most a couple of visits to the documentation. Oh well...)

You have to strip some options from ppp.options to have ppp to work with
diald. Refer to the manpages...

Phil.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: