Re: [rms@santafe.edu: Hurd packager]

To: jim@jimpick.com
Cc: rdm@test.legislate.com, debian-hurd@kato.legislate.com, ean@novare.net, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [rms@santafe.edu: Hurd packager]
From: Richard Stallman <rms@santafe.edu>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 00:53:03 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 199807010653.AAA12777@aztec.santafe.edu>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <87af6vnw9c.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> (message from Jim Pick on 30 Jun 1998 01:12:31 -0700)
References: <19980626154309.G7391@novare.net> <19980626200334.F9094@test.legislate.com> <87emwamp6m.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> <199806291832.MAA10374@aztec.santafe.edu> <87af6vnw9c.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com>

    The glibc approach makes the most sense to me - as they are both
    supposed to be using the same glibc anyways, right?  That's basically
    why I was wondering whether or not there was already some measure of
    binary compatibility in there.  I still don't really understand the
    issues involved (but I haven't done anything with the Hurd other than
    get it to boot).

I don't know the technical issues either--if you are interested in
working on this, please ask tb@mit.edu for his advice.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Prev by Date: committees and SLINK goals
Next by Date: Re: .so and .a libs, tcl, postgres = in over my head
Previous by thread: committees and SLINK goals
Next by thread: Re: .so and .a libs, tcl, postgres = in over my head
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread