Re: Hamm Bug Stamp-Out List for June 25, 1998

To: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>, 23742-done@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hamm Bug Stamp-Out List for June 25, 1998
From: eichin@kitten.gen.ma.us (Mark W. Eichin)
Date: 25 Jun 1998 17:19:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] xe17m25ji21.fsf@paycheck.thok.org>
In-reply-to: Rob Browning's message of "25 Jun 1998 13:33:17 -0500"
References: <19980625094543.A16156@debian.org> <[🔎] 87n2b179tg.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com> <[🔎] 87lnql72mq.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>

Yeah, there's been enough discussion in this context.  The decision to
ditch the "emacs" name as a package name was in fact made for good
reasons, a while back; just-before-the-release is the wrong time to
revisit it. As emacs and emacs19 maintainer, I'm closing it, with this
message.  Feel free to discuss further on debian-devel, but I'd
recommend either dropping it or taking it to the technical committee.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- emacs -> emacs19. Why?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- Re: Hamm Bug Stamp-Out List for June 25, 1998
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: Hamm Bug Stamp-Out List for June 25, 1998
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: automating the "Intents to package" was Re: Please follow protocol when you announce your Intents to package
Next by Date: non-html versions
Previous by thread: Re: Hamm Bug Stamp-Out List for June 25, 1998
Next by thread: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread