Re: Debian Re-organization proposals (was: Re: so what?)
On 3 Jun 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
<snip>
> b) we neeed to release more often, and on schedule
> (I like guys proposal of an updated stable pool that can be
> tested continuuls, frozen, and released fast -- since there are
> never any release critical bugs in the stable pool, the current
> delay does not occur)
<snip>
I'm that guy, or at least I think I recognize this as a paraphrase of
something I suggested. Thanks for the comment. I think such a plan would
be a considerable improvement over current practice. I'm a bit
disappointed that the suggestion seems to have been passed by
without very much discussion (not that the debian project needs a lot
of debian-devel bandwidth and developer energy devoted to discussing
such things right now -- it seems to me that some of the current
debian-devel discussion threads ought to be postponed until after hamm is
out as a stable release, and/or moved to debian-policy or somesuch).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: