Re: RFD : libg++/gcc/egcs upgrades needed for libc6 (READ ME)
mdorman@debian.org wrote:
> We don't have a libg++ for anything but 2.7.2.3, and since we have at
> least one Debian system-specific tool (menu) that uses it, it would
> look bad to move away from that compiler.
I do hope to remove the libg++ dependancy of menu shortly.
Also, for the reader, I'd like to say here that in menu I very
frequently did things like
- main(){a; b; c;}
+ void foo(){a;b;} main(){foo();c;}
(I.e., just remove "a;b;" and replace them for a function call,
because gcc 2.7.x would not compile the former, but would
compile the latter (a, b, c in this respect naturally refer
to catches and other exception stuff).
Basically, repeated that stuff just as long untill gcc 2.7.x
would compile menu -- not exactly ideal. It also explains why
gcc-2.7.2.3 is able to compile menu :(.
As soon as we've got a working c++ compiler in Debian, I plan
to use that one (and I'm sure 2.7 will not compile menu after that).
--
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
The upstream maintainer is allowed to do things different
than Debian, but only if he has good reasons to do so.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: