Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm
> Are we sure we want to fix _ALL_ the problems before freezing? Many of the
> bugs against optional packages, and IMHO the distribution should not wait
> for optional packages, which have been proven to be unimportant by the
> fact that no-one has bothered to fix a >= important bug. We should just
> cruelly dump those packages to contrib, AFAIK contrib is a place for
> packages that are not maintained.
That's easy. Let me know the package. I'll put it on my list, downgrade the
bug, and keep that package from going into "frozen".
> Remember, that the sole reason I ever installed debian was because it had
> the 2.0 kernel first. I probably weren't the only one and nowadays the
> bleeding endge freeks are all installing Redhat, because the latest stable
> debian is closing the age one year!
Yes. And the sooner these bugs get fixed, the sooner we'll be on the cutting
edge again.
Brian
( bcwhite@verisim.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generated by Signify v1.03. For this and more, visit http://www.verisim.com/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: