RE: Looking for a reason to not orphan my howto
libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're close
to completing hamm.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> ----------
> From: Chris Fearnley[SMTP:cjf@netaxs.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 30. Dezember 1997 23:38
> To: bruce@va.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for a reason to not orphan my howto
>
> 'bruce@va.debian.org wrote:'
> >
> >Scott,
> >
> >Let's not go non-linear over a bug. Please tell us what dependencies
> >should be fixed, and where?
>
> libc6 is OK. We need new releases of libc5 and libc5-dev for
> bo-updates and hamm. Has that happened yet?
>
> --
> Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
> cjf@netaxs.com | Design Science Revolutionary
> http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Explorer in Universe
> ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller
>
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe"
> to
> debian-private-request@lists.debian.org .
> Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: