Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones

To: Oscar Levi <elf@buici.com>
Cc: Debian-Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 12:21:22 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981203122122.A15210@debian.org>
Mail-followup-to: Oscar Levi <elf@buici.com>, Debian-Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19981203112908.A9419@hazel.buici.com>; from Oscar Levi on Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 11:29:10AM -0800
References: <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <13918.5337.649051.933932@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <199811272253.WAA12658@linda.lfix.co.uk> <[🔎] 13926.57795.472634.8000@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 19981203112908.A9419@hazel.buici.com>

On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 11:29:10AM -0800, Oscar Levi wrote:
> Simply stated: Ian writes sense.

Removal of the patch and advertising clauses isn't sense.  =>

-- 
Show me the code or get out of my way.

Attachment: pgpKIZ2dToctt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
  - From: Oscar Levi <elf@buici.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Intent to package BigBrother network monitor
Next by Date: Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
Previous by thread: Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
Next by thread: Re: DFSG2: Why we need clear guidelines, not woolly ones
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread