Re: __register_frame_info: A complete scan
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > All these binaries need to be recompiled for slink; they will break with
> > the new libc6. I excluded C++ binaries from the scan, since they don't
> > need to be recompiled -- they just need an updated libstdc++.
> Is this actually right?
I don't know :)
> AFAIK NO library or aplication should define this as a dynamic
> symbol, it should always be statically linked. Has anyone asked the
> egcs people about it?
I've already handed in my clue badge regarding this issue. I don't know
how C++ is supposed to be linked. I'm just going by observed behaviour