[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Guile 1.3 == SO 4



*-James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
|
| David Welton <davidw@gate.cks.com> writes:
| 
| > If it is not compatible, why put symlinks?
| 
| They're not.  I got scwm working again by putting a compat symlink
| .so.3 -> .so.4.

Because one program _seems to_ work you assume that you know better
than the upstream? It is possible you are right, but by default I
trust jimbs knowledge of guile. Even if a program compiles against
a lib with new soname, how do you know that it will behave properly?

-- 
The only way tcsh "rocks" is when the rocks are attached to its feet
in the deepest part of a very deep lake.             (Linus Torvalds)
olet@ifi.uio.no   [-: .elOle. :-]   olet@debian.org


Reply to: