Re: libgtop0 ==> libgtop1?
In article <[🔎] 87af24qdui.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com>, Jim Pick
<jim@jimpick.com> writes
>
>Ian Lynagh <ian@lynagh.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
>> I have a bug filed against libgtop:
>>
>> >Package: libgtop0
>> >Version: 0.26.2-1
>> >Severity: important
>> >
>> >It seems the soname has been changed
>> >/usr/lib/libgtop.so.1
>> >
>> >This breaks many things compiled against libgtop0 including many gnome
>> >panel
>> >applets. Do the packages linked against libgtop need to be recompiled
>> >or
>> >should this package be renamed to libgtop1?
>>
>> Should libgtop0 be renamed libgtop1 and the old version restored
>> as libgtop0 (which I don't think I have a copy of, incidentally).
>> What about libgtop-daemon and libgtop-dev?
>
>I'm going to recompile the gnome stuff this week. There are a bunch
>of fixes to go in as well.
Right, so the old version does not need to be reinstated, but should
the package be renamed libgtop1 or left as libgtop0?
Thanks
Ian
--
Ian Lynagh - ian@lynagh.demon.co.uk
http://www.lynagh.demon.co.uk/
Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
Reply to: