Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?

To: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.Arizona.EDU>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 17:22:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.05.9811061722000.12730-100000@newton.physics.arizona.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.OSF.4.05.9811061717260.12730-100000@newton.physics.arizona.edu>

On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, John Lapeyre wrote:

lapeyr>On 6 Nov 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
lapeyr>
lapeyr>rlb>Overall the learning curve for getting this stuff right for new Bash/X
lapeyr>rlb>users is fairly steep ATM, and some of it (at least the umask/--login
lapeyr>rlb>and PATH/--login stuff) is both undocumented, and a bit unexpected, at
lapeyr>rlb>least by me.
lapeyr>	
lapeyr>	I never figured all this out.  

	Sorry ,  I accidentally sent, when I meant to cancel.  Please
ignore this.
	


John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>
Tucson,AZ     http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre

Reply to:

References:
- Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
  - From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.Arizona.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
Next by Date: Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
Previous by thread: Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
Next by thread: Re: bash logins: a little buggy (and potentially dangerous)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread