Re: Slang libraries
On Mon, Oct 19, 1998 at 03:50:52PM +0400, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 11:04:40PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > We won't keep both; slang0.99.38 was still around because until two
> > days ago we didn't have a proper source package for slang1. Now that
> > we do, we have a source package for slang1 but no longer one for
> > slang0.99.38. This means another set of packages to recompile.
> So bugs should be submitted against appropriate packages?
The missing source package was my fault. The idea was to have a
slang0.99.38 and a slang1 package so that recompilation was not
required. Unfortunately both packages have their source as "slang"
which means that the source package is replaced on an upload of either
package.
I can re-upload both packages so that the sources won't conflict.
Ideally all packages should be moving to slang1 anyway - but it is not
as well tested and a lot of the core (e.g. boot floppies) depends on
it.
Jim
--
Jim Mintha, Geography System Administrator, U.B.C.
mintha@geog.ubc.ca, or jmintha@debian.org <www.geog.ubc.ca/jim>
Home: 604 733-3102 Work: 604 822-2174 Fax: 604 822-6150
Where you want to be tomorrow... Debian GNU/Linux <www.debian.org>
Reply to: