Re: Removing Packages in Slink for Debian 2.1
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 October 1998, at 12 h 19, the keyboard of Brian White
> <bcwhite@verisim.com> wrote:
>
> > The following are packages I feel we can remove:
> ...
> > netatalk 25598 netalk: several problems (and the solution) [64] (Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>)
>
> As a new developer, I just want to be sure. Does it mean we can ship 2.1 with *less* packages than 2.0 and important packages like this one? If so, why would people upgrade to slink?
Slink contains >500 packages more than hamm. I didn't count that many packages
on Glider's list.
Why upgrade? Because the packages are newer? Contain new^H^H^Hless bugs?
Reflect the current development?
Regards,
Joey
--
Install joe (Joey's Own Editor) correct: Joe's Own Editor
Reply to: