Re: Bug#27753: libpgjava: depends on jdk1.1-runtime, which is now included in jdk1.1
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 02:22:53PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
> Hamish> Why doesn't jdk1.1 provide java-virtual-machine? That's an
> Hamish> officially listed virtual package and would have avoided
> Hamish> this problem, and would also solve two bug reports filed
> Hamish> against guavac.
>
> Because I wasn't sure if that was still a valid virtual package name? :)
>
> We've gone round the issue of virtual packages for jvm's a couple of
> times & I'm still not certain anything got decided. Next release will
> comply.
I agree, there is some confusion. Some jdk 1.1 specific names were
proposed too but I don't know if they are official or not. Is there any
traffic on debian-java? I subscribed but haven't seen anything.
I have reassigned you my two finest bug reports about java-virtual-machine :-)
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
Reply to: