Re: How about using bzip2 as the standard *.deb compression format?
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
>> (I said)
>> I think we already went through this discussion a short while back.
>> Unless I'm missing something new, it was pretty much decided that the
>> memory overhead of bzip2 was too great for low-mem or slow PCs to handle.
>It'd STILL be nice to be able to use bzip2 for package source on REALLY BIG
>packages (Mozilla, X)
very good point! those users with slow / low mem machines are less likely
to be installing these packages anyway! Perhaps we could compromise by
saying that anyone running these on a slow machine will be patient anyway
and can deal with the extra slowness and disk thrashing of using bzip2?
| oOOooO /
--| oOobodoO / firstname.lastname@example.org
--| ooOoOo /
| II / "Rocky Road," croaked the toad.
| II /