Re: Documentation license problem solved: OpenContent License (OPL)
Ben Gertzfield quotes:
> This document outlines the principles underlying the OpenContent (OC)
> movement and may be redistributed provided it remains unaltered.
So the OpenContent license is itself not OpenContent.
> For legal purposes, this document is the license under which OpenContent
> is made available for use.
I assume that "OpenContent" here refers to works published under this
license? This is not sufficiently clear. A definition is needed.
I would guess that this thing has not been reviewed by an attorney.
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
Reply to: